<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Filmcritic Reviews</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2011-09-21://271</id>
    <updated>2012-05-11T02:38:53Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Filmcritic.com – Movie Reviews and DVD Reviews</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.34-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Dark Shadows (2012)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/dark-shadows/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115712</id>

    <published>2012-05-10T18:00:44Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-11T02:38:53Z</updated>

    <summary>Fans of the Dan Curtis cult classic need to proceed with caution. This is not your -- or your parents&apos; -- Dark Shadows. Oh sure, the cast of characters appears to be the same and the storyline still centers on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Gibron</name>
        <uri>http://www.billgibron.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fans of the Dan Curtis cult classic need to proceed with caution. This is not your -- or your parents' --<i> Dark Shadows</i>. Oh sure, the cast of characters appears to be the same and the storyline still centers on the cursed Collins clan, but for the most part, director Tim Burton and screenwriter Seth Grahame-Smith (the scribe behind <i>Pride and Prejudice and Zombies</i> and <i>Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter</i>) have decided to take the material in a more familiar, non-fan friendly direction. Gone are the interpersonal intrigues and snarky subtexts that made the '60s/'70s soap so successful. In its place is a 'shadow' of its former self, still fun and fascinating but a bit of a letdown for those on the original Barnabas bandwagon.</p> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the 18th Century, Barnabas Collins (Johnny Depp) and his family traveled to the New World and began a successful fishing enterprise. They built their oversized manor, Collinwood, and set down permanent roots. While in love with the fetching Josette (Bella Heathcote), Barnabas became physically infatuated with a servant girl named Angelique (Eva Green). Little did he know that she was a witch. When he spurned her continued advances, she killed his future fiance and cursed Barnabas to a life as a vampire. Now, 200 years later, he is resurrected by an unlucky construction crew.</p>
Returning to Collinwood, he finds the house and the family name is disarray. Matron Elizabeth (Michele Pfeiffer) can barely keep up with the bills, while her daughter Carolyn (Chloe Moretz) is merely rude and rebellious. Roger Collins (Jonny Lee Miller) is busy trying to find ways to rip-off the locals while his son David (Gulliver McGrath) is troubled by visions of ghosts. Everyone hopes that the arrival of a new Governess (Heathcote) will help resident psychiatrist Dr. Hoffman (Helena Bonham Carter) reach the boy. When he learns that Angelique is still alive and using her own cannery to destroy the Collins clan, Barnabas vows payback. <br /><br />As someone who is intimately familiar with all 1225 episodes of the seminal series, yours truly can clearly admit to being a bit disappointed in this take on the&nbsp;<i>Dark Shadows </i>legacy. Instead of striving for a balance between kitsch and creeps, Depp and Burton have decided to play the practical fish out of water angle, and they do so quite well. Our superstar is especially good at being both clever and clueless, managing his malapropisms and misunderstandings with the proper level of cheek. He is well matched by Pfeiffer, her grace in decline a perfect match for Elizabeth's fading fortunes. Elsewhere, Green gives good evil while Moretz milks her post-flower child churlishness for all it's worth. Others, like Heathcote, Miller, and Carter are given little to do. <br /><br />Yet it's the weird, uneven tone that Burton struggles with that really undermines <i>Shadows</i>' obvious pleasures. Unlike<i> <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1999/sleepy-hollow/">Sleepy Hollow,</a></i> which always knew it was a Hammer-inspired bloodbath, the mood is all over the map. One moment, we are neck deep in victims, the next, Depp is suffering through a series of sight gags in a music montage. Even more confusing is a love scene where Barnabas and Angelique literally bounce off the walls. You can see what Burton is striving for, a kind of hip homage to the malaise of the Me Decade. It was a similar approach that sunk his otherwise excellent disaster spoof, <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1996/mars-attacks/"><i>Mars Attacks!</i></a> Here, by messing with the source, the director is guaranteed to displease the devoted. <br /><br />Still, there's enough here to warrant even a diehard's curiosity. While it may mess with your memories of this unusual broadcast anomaly, <i>Dark Shadows</i> has a lot going for it. What it's missing, however, keeps it from reaching the same heights as its inspiration. <br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Bernie</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/bernie/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115729</id>

    <published>2012-05-10T18:00:20Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-11T02:42:38Z</updated>

    <summary>After making so many films about basically decent people, it&apos;s good to know that Richard Linklater had some Hitchcock in him. In his deft comedy Bernie, Linklater brings not just the winsome touch that&apos;s made his lighter work like The...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Barsanti</name>
        <uri>http://www.chrisbarsanti.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>After making so many films about basically decent people, it's good to know that Richard Linklater had some Hitchcock in him. In his deft comedy <i>Bernie</i>, Linklater brings not just the winsome touch that's made his lighter work like <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2003/the-school-of-rock/">The School of Rock</a></i> so broadly appealing but also a more acidic and satirical tone that darkens the shade under the bright Texas sun. Hitch would have sharpened his hooks more, particularly for a film set in such a busybody-riddled small town, but he would have appreciated Linklater's steady accumulation of detail and grievances, not to mention the resolutely straightforward handling of the murder itself. What Linklater brings to this curious and fact-based story, which just about no other American filmmaker of the moment could, is his expansive sense of character and genial lack of judgment. This is a film about a really nice guy. A murderer, for sure, but just the nicest murderer you're ever likely to meet.</p> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Based on a 1998 magazine article called "Midnight in the Garden of East Texas," the film concerns one Bernie Tiede, a mortician who shows up one day in the small town of Carthage and proceeds to charm the pants off everybody he meets. First shown cheerfully but respectfully showing students how to prepare a body for display (glue is helpful in keeping those pesky eyelids from popping open, apparently), Bernie is soon bopping around the Carthage funeral home like some mustached cherub. Played by Jack Black with a light, Tinkerbell tread and sugary-sweet oh-my-goodness choir director mien, Bernie is one of those engines of organization and cheer that keep little communities like Carthage humming. As related in the direct-to-camera monologues that Linklater cleverly uses throughout to fill in his back story, if Bernie wasn't comforting grieving family members, he was singing at church, putting on school plays, or just giving away presents that he bought for no good reason.</p>
The night to Bernie's day was Marjorie Nugent (Shirley MacLaine), a wealthy old widow whom Bernie began squiring around town not long after the death of her crusty husband. Although many of the townspeople note that they assumed Bernie was gay, there were still eyebrows raised at how much time he was spending with Marjorie and how the two of them were spending her money. For a woman who seemed as tight with the purse strings as <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1946/its-a-wonderful-life/">It's a Wonderful Life</a></i>'s Mr. Potter -- she even ran a local bank and was notorious for turning down loans just to do it -- Marjorie's new habit of blowing thousands to send herself and Bernie around the world on luxury liners seemed suspicious. Almost more suspicious was why such a nice guy as Bernie would put up with the sour-faced gripings of somebody like Marjorie all day. When it turns out that Bernie really&nbsp;<i>couldn't</i>&nbsp;put up with it anymore, the locals still weren't able to think badly of him.<div><br /></div><div><i>Bernie</i> has a sunny and ambling tone which nicely reflects the East Texas setting (not to mention a helpful animated map that illustrates the great differences between the piney woods of the state's eastern region and the "snobs" over in Dallas and the weirdos down in "the People's Republic of Austin"). Linklater stocks the screen with a cast who are impressively able to come off like non-actors just yakking at the camera, even though a great number of them turn out to just be actors with a wily sense of play. Eager to play along is Matthew McConaughey (seeming to relish the break from Kate Hudson rom-coms, just as Jack Black looks eager to be out from behind the animated curtain), playing it broad and clownish as press-hungry district attorney Danny Buck Davidson who doesn't understand why people don't seem to care that he's just caught a murderer. Located somewhere between the dry wit of Hitchcock's <i>The Trouble with Harry</i>&nbsp;(which starred a much younger MacLaine) and the small-town lampoonery of <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1997/waiting-for-guffman/">Waiting for Guffman</a></i>, Linklater's comedy is somewhat like those gossipy Carthage kibbitzers who don't understand why Danny Buck is being so mean to Bernie. For them, character speaks louder than one action.</div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>I Wish</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/i-wish/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115621</id>

    <published>2012-05-10T18:00:10Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-11T02:50:41Z</updated>

    <summary>Artists who try to understand the minds of children are hardly ever successful. The usual tendency is to err on the side of the simplistic (wide-eyed wonder of the innocent) or unbelievably complex (the child who acts like a miniature...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Barsanti</name>
        <uri>http://www.chrisbarsanti.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Drama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Artists who try to understand the minds of children are hardly ever successful. The usual tendency is to err on the side of the simplistic (wide-eyed wonder of the innocent) or unbelievably complex (the child who acts like a miniature adult). In his bright-eyed and wispy-light comedy <i>I Wish</i>, Hirokazu Kore-Eda doesn't fall prey to either cliched manner of handling his young, sprightly characters. The children he puts on screen here are smart and thoughtful, but not overly so, whimsical, short-sighted, and fully convinced of the efficacy of magical thinking -- in other words, wholly like children in the real world. That he's not able to take these characters and turn his film into something more engaging and easier to grab a hold of, is an unfortunate thing -- he understands people to a degree most filmmakers would envy. If only that was all that were necessary.</p> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>When we first see schoolchild Koichi (Koki Maeda), he's grousing about a cloud in the distance. Far on the horizon from his town of Kagoshima, a volcano has been spewing ash for some time. He's sick of it, because the volcano leaves a thin layer of ash on everything in his room. There isn't much that's truy going wrong in his life -- he's not entirely sure why he and his mother are living with their grandparents, but other than that he has friends and dashes off to school in the morning with a commendable level of enthusiasm. Meanwhile, in the town of Fukuoka some distance away, Koichi's younger brother Ryu (Ohshiro Maeda, all gap-toothed smile and winning enthusiasm) is as seemingly well-adjusted to the parental situation, gamely trying to get his layabout guitarist dad up in the morning before dashing off to school like a human sunbeam. (It's hard to remember another young performer who filled a screen with such ridiculous joy just by showing up.)</p>
Though Koichi and Ryu don't really talk about it, neither of them is happy with the situation. There doesn't seem to be much that their immature-seeming parents are willing to do about it, content to live apart no matter how much it drives their kids crazy. The over-serious Koichi -- who has a knotted brow at the best of times -- overhears some other kids claiming that if you watch the point where two trains pass each other, you get a wish fulfilled. Since he's tired of not having a real family anymore, Koichi decides that was he has to do is be there for the inaugural journey of a new local bullet train route, when the two trains pass the other by.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>It's a difficult conceit to swallow, for sure, and one that takes its sweet time being brought to fruition. Kore-eda's not a filmmaker to rush things, and he has the ability to make even the mundane scenes of Koichi, Ryu, and their friends goofing around at their respective schools seem like tiny celebrations of life. Behind the light-handed comedy that takes up much of the film's overextended running time is a story about unfulfilled lives and unlikely-to-be-fulfilled longings. This ranges from Koichi's need to be reunited with his family to Ryu's preference to leave things be (he hated how their parents were when toghter), and their grandfather's quixotic idea to get back into business for himself by selling sweets to one of Ryu's friends intense drive to become an actress in order to get away from the bar that her mom runs.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Quietude is the mood here, not unlike Kore-Eda's previous film, the great <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2009/still-walking/">Still Walking</a></i>. But <i>I Wish</i> doesn't have a fraction of that film's dramatic intimacy. It runs at just over two hours, and well over a quarter of that time could have been cut without diminishing any of these characters, or the power of the distance that lies between the reality all of them live and the world they'd like to get to. During the sweet-natured adventure that concludes the film, it will be hard not to be won over to some extent. But Kore-eda brings this sequence together too late in a film that meanders when it should have been searching. He has the people and the mood, just not the story.</div><div><br /></div><div>aka <i>Kiseki</i></div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Where Do We Go Now?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/where-do-we-go-now/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6062859</id>

    <published>2012-05-10T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-11T02:55:35Z</updated>

    <summary>Filmmakers run all kinds of risks when they try to update the classics; for all the universality of some of the great dramas, they can fail miserably when downloaded into new and sometimes incompatible formats (witness what happens when studios...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Barsanti</name>
        <uri>http://www.chrisbarsanti.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Drama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Filmmakers run all kinds of risks when they try to update the classics; for all the universality of some of the great dramas, they can fail miserably when downloaded into new and sometimes incompatible formats (witness what happens when studios try to dress up Austen and Shakespeare as candy-colored high school comedies). This risk is even more prevalent, though, when it comes to the Greeks -- everything being declaimed from on high and all those gods causing mischief makes for a tricky translation -- which is why most everybody stays away. (Woody Allen's <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1995/mighty-aphrodite/"><i>Mighty Aphrodite</i></a> is one of the only films in recent memory that used an honest-to-God chorus and got away with it.) Nadine Labaki's zesty <i>Where Do We Go Now?</i> has to navigate two minefields: updating Aristophanes's <i>Lysistrata</i> and setting this comedy amidst modern Lebanon's murderous religious strife. The result isn't a new classic, but stands nevertheless as a potent and lively satire about how the violence of men tears societies down and the lengths to which women go to staunch the bleeding.</p> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The inspiration from Aristophanes isn't one-for-one, here -- the women of the isolated Lebanese village in Labaki's film don't withold sex from the menfolk in order to get them to behave and stop fighting. In this take, both Christian and Muslim women in the village conspire together to keep their men distracted and ignorant of the sectarian fighting going on in the world outside. Labaki makes the reason clear in her brilliantly staged opening: the women, dressed in black and clutching flowers, march into the town's cemetery (Muslims on one side, Christians on the other) to mourn the dead from earlier fighting. In a clever move, Labaki stages the scene as a Brechtian breach of the fourth wall: the women start moving in a choregraphed fashion while the soundtrack sings of their tragedy. ("A tale of a lonely town / Mines scattered all around.")</p>
Although much of it was shot in a Lebanese village where the mosque actually does stand next to a church, Labaki's creation is a more fabled thing. Like some vision of the past, it is almost entirely isolated; two boys on a scooter hauling a cart on a comically narrow and twisting path on a perilous ledge (barbed wire and danger signs to each side) are their only contact with the outside world. A goofy but nicely shot sequence early on follows the machinations necessary for the town to watch TV -- they gather expectantly at the top of a hill, the only spot for decent reception, to watch a fuzzy weather forecast like it was a Hollywood blockbuster. Of course, when the news comes on, the women end up staging an argument in order to drown out the story about Christians and Muslims fighting nearby. The women -- along with the imam and priest, who have a nice Matthau-Lemmon rapport -- do whatever it takes to take the men's minds off demonizing the other, whether it's burning newspapers or importing a gaggle of Ukrainian exotic dancers. Their gimmicks and the resulting melodramas play as broad farce, but brightly and lightly so.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>Labaki's comedy is both clownish and dead-serious, as the best satires are. Showing up herself in a starring role (as she did in her last film, the witty and sweet-hearted <i>Caramel</i>), Labaki plays a Christian café owner doing a bad job of hiding her attraction for the Muslim handyman who's fixing her place up. This is initially a broadhearted romance, with Labaki pulling off another great musical interlude where she fantasizes about the two of them dancing. But the story bends sinister once an accident breaks the church's cross and accusations are thrown about. It isn't long before Christian and Muslim neighbors are bellowing at each other and plotting revenge for imagined insults. Throwing themselves in between like parents trying to contain unruly children, the women have to resort to increasingly elaborate subterfuges to keep the peace. While the sitcom nature of some of these capers wears thin at times, Labaki never takes her eye off what she's lampooning. When her character screams, "You're just animals!", it's to mourn every life snuffed out for worshipping the wrong way or belonging to the wrong group.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>aka <i>Et maintenant, on va où?</i></div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Exit Interview</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/2012/05/the-exit-interview/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012:/features//270.6115623</id>

    <published>2012-05-09T05:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T02:28:30Z</updated>

    <summary>Well, folks, this is a Very Special Column, and to make that point, I am going to interview myself about it. So, everyone, meet Interviewer Me!Hello, everyone.Let&apos;s get started, shall we?Right then. To cut right to the chase: Rumor has...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Scalzi</name>
        <uri>http://scalzi.com/whatever</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="John Scalzi on Scifi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="avatar" label="avatar" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="district9" label="district 9" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="duncanjones" label="duncan jones" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="georgelucas" label="george lucas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="inception" label="inception" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="johnscalzi" label="john scalzi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="moon" label="moon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starwarsepisode4anewhope" label="star wars: episode 4 - a new hope" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="transformers" label="transformers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="walle" label="WALL-E" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/">
        <![CDATA[Well, folks, this is a Very Special Column, and to make that point, I am going to interview myself about it. So, everyone, meet Interviewer Me!<br /><br /><b>Hello, everyone.</b><br />Let's get started, shall we?<br /><br /><b>Right then. To cut right to the chase: Rumor has it this is your last science fiction film column for Filmcritic.com. Is this true?</b><br />Indeed it is. I started this column on May 8, 2008, and am stopping today, May 9, 2012. That's as close to symmetry as you get in this business.<br /><br /><b>Why are you stopping?</b><br />]]>
        <![CDATA[Because, as I understand it, things 
here are going in a different direction, which I'm sure will be a fine 
direction, just one that doesn't have me in it. <br /><br /><b>How are you 
handling it? Are you angry? Outraged? Will you be on the street with a 
cardboard sign that says, "Will Snark About George Lucas for Food"?</b><br />It's
 always politic to say that one is fine about these sorts of things, but
 in this case, it's actually the truth. The AMC and Filmcritic.com folks 
have always been spectacularly supportive of what I write here and of me
 in general, and I've had the good fortune of working with a number of 
very fine editors. And of course the readers have been great, too. It's 
been a heck of a lot of fun, and while I'm sad to see it come to an end,
 well, you know, everything ends. The ride itself was a blast. <br /><br />And as for me, well, look: I have a new novel coming out in just about a month (called <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2012/05/01/the-redshirts-tour-places-dates-and-times/"><i>Redshirts</i></a>)
 that's getting fantastic reviews; I'm working on a video game; this 
year I'm nominated for a Hugo, one of the biggest awards in science 
fiction; and Paramount Pictures is developing one of my books for a 
film. You know what? I'm just fine, thanks. <br /><br />I<b>'m relieved to hear you say that.</b><br />Of course you are, you're me. <br /><br /><b>So,
 what's your take on science fiction 
film </b><b>over the last four years</b><b>? Does it represent a particular era? Has it been a good time for 
science fiction film? A bad one? Where do we go from here?</b><br />Well,
 it's definitely an interesting time. Science fiction has always been a 
film genre about visual spectacle, and these last four years are no exception. We've seen the rise in 3D, cemented by the 
enormous success of <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2009/avatar/"><i>Avatar</i></a>, and we've seen the comic book film -- 
which often code-shares with science fiction -- develop into a 
finely tuned formatted science (well, when Marvel characters are 
involved, anyway; movies with DC characters still have a few bugs in the
 pipeline). The increasing importance of the international market has 
also had an influence on the science fiction films being made -- I would
 argue in fact that it's the genre where the "global blockbuster" is at 
its peak form, for better or worse. <br /><br />There's a lot of argument for worse -- see <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2007/transformers/"><i>Transformers</i></a>
 for this -- but it's also important to note that there have been 
science fiction films in the last four years that will go down as 
canonical films in the genre. <br /><br /><b>For example?</b><br />The previously mentioned <i>Avatar</i>,
 which in terms of film production and effects processing may 
eventually be the most influential science fiction film since <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1977/star-wars-episode-iv---a-new-hope/"><i>Star Wars</i></a>.
 <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2008/wall-e/"><i>WALL-E</i></a>, one of the best science fiction films of all time. <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2010/inception/"><i>Inception</i></a>,
 which, had someone like Godard made it 45 years ago, and a lot less 
expensively, and starring Eddie Constantine, would be a classic of the 
French New Wave. <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2009/district-9/"><i>District 9</i></a>, which came out of nowhere (well, South Africa by way of New Zealand). <br /><br />It's worth noting that <i>Avatar</i>, <i>Inception</i>, and <i>District 9</i>
 were all nominated for Best Picture Academy Awards -- not always an 
indicator of immortal quality, to be sure, but in this case at least 
some validation of work done right (<i>WALL-E</i> took home the Best Animated Feature, to boot). I also have a spot in my heart for Duncan Jones' <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2009/moon/"><i>Moon</i></a>, which I think will be one of those films whose stature grows as time goes on.<br /><br />And yes: tons of crap, too. But there's <i>always</i>
 tons of crap all the time. The good stuff gets remembered. The films 
I've noted are the ones I suspect will still be watched 20 or 30
 years from now.<br /><br /><b>Anything you wish film studios would do differently, regarding science fiction films?</b><br />Just
 the things I wish they'd do in general, for all films: One, spend more 
time on scripts so those of us who do like good stories have a better 
chance of getting one. Two, try to slide in a few more modestly budgeted
 films, because not everything has to be a home run -- if you're 
smart, you can still make money just getting on base. Three: Did I 
mention scripts?<br /><br /><b>Any last thoughts?</b><br />Oh, you know. 
Just thanks: Thanks to AMC and Filmcritic.com for having me, and thanks 
to everyone who read, enjoyed, and commented on these columns for the 
last four years. I had a great time, the whole time. <br /><br /><b>Excellent. Now let's go have a donut.</b> <br />Agreed.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How Actresses Can Save the Movie Industry for Women</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/2012/05/actresses-can-save-film-industry-for-women/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012:/features//270.6115603</id>

    <published>2012-05-07T17:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T00:42:32Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ "Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work."&nbsp; Thomas Edison is not the first person I think of when it comes to advice for women, but this one rang true. Women,...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thelma Adams</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Thelma Adams on Reel Women" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="angelinajolie" label="angelina jolie" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="annettebening" label="annette bening" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="charliesangels" label="charlie&apos;s angels" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="charlizetheron" label="charlize theron" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="diablocody" label="diablo cody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="donniedarko" label="donnie darko" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="drewbarrymore" label="drew barrymore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="francophrenia" label="francophrenia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jamesfranco" label="james franco" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jasonreitman" label="jason reitman" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jenniferaniston" label="jennifer aniston" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="juliannemoore" label="julianne moore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lisacholodenko" label="lisa cholodenko" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nancyjuvonen" label="nancy juvonen" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="neverbeenkissed" label="never been kissed" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="shaunacross" label="shauna cross" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="snowwhiteandthehuntsman" label="snow white and the huntsman" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spiderman" label="spider-man" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thekidsareallright" label="the kids are all right" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="whattoexpectwhenyoureexpecting" label="what to expect when you&apos;re expecting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="whipit" label="whip it" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="youngadult" label="young adult" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/">
        <![CDATA[ "Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work."&nbsp; <br /><br />Thomas Edison is not the first person I think of when it comes to advice for women, but this one rang true. Women, we know, are not afraid to work. But often, particularly in the film industry, women function as support staff. They work in development (the "D-girls"), or as agents, publicists, casting agents, executive assistants, designers. The women who currently have the most potential to change the face of the movies we watch are the most familiar faces -- the actresses who can use their star-power currency to "fund" projects.&nbsp; <br /><br />Some actresses vote with their choices of roles; some create their own production companies; and some step up behind the camera. Here are three who have made great strides for women in movies by bringing terrific and varied female images to the screen.<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<br /><b>Drew Barrymore</b><br />For the under-appreciated  <a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/429408/Whip-It/overview"><i>Whip It</i></a>,
which had cult success and strong, realistic 
female characters, Drew Barrymore drew on her success as an A-lister to 
raise money to produce, direct, and costar in a film written by Shauna 
Cross (<a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/540256/What-to-Expect-When-Youre-Expecting/details"><i>What to Expect When You're Expecting</i></a>).<span class="st"> </span> Barrymore founded her production company, Flower Films, in 1995 with Nancy Juvonen, and their slate has included the <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2000/charlies-angels/"><i>Charlie's Angels</i></a> movies, as well as <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1999/never-been-kissed/"><i>Never Been Kissed</i></a> and <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2001/donnie-darko/"><i>Donnie Darko</i></a>,
 among others. If the studios can use the star power of actresses to 
fund movies, there's no reason that actresses can't use that same star power
 to drive their own projects. (This is hardly gender-reliant, as proven 
by James Franco, who has veered from big-budget films like <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2002/spider-man/"><i>Spider-Man</i></a> to awards bait like <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2008/milk/"><i>Milk</i></a> and festival fare like <a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/562124/Francophrenia/details"><i>Francophrenia</i></a>.) <span class="st"><br /><b>How She Can Save Movies:</b>
 By aiming high, producing her own movies where she chooses writers and 
directors to create both the kinds of roles she wants to play and those 
she wants to see on screen, and in general calling the shots.<br /><br /></span><b>Charlize Theron<br /></b>Another
 example of a big star who time and again takes on interesting roles 
that expand the spectrum of female images we see on the big screen. She 
is not afraid of being a bitch -- and that is a very good thing. She 
earned an Oscar for throwing her model-blond beauty under the bus to 
play a real-life serial killer (<a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2003/monster/"><i>Monster</i></a>) by crawling under that woman's blemished skin. Last year's <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2011/young-adult-1/"><i>Young Adult</i></a>,
 with a Diablo Cody script and directed by Jason Reitman, pushed the 
actress into darkly comic territory. It wasn't an easy sell because her 
husband-stealing singleton was so unsympathetic, but Theron voted with 
her celebrity status before jumping on the bigger budget <a href="movies.amctv.com/movie/528938/Snow-White-and-the-Huntsman/details"><i>Snow White and the Huntsman</i></a>. It's likely that she took less money for her indie role in <i>Young Adult</i><span class="st"> </span> and, in the long run, her performance will be recognized as one of the peaks of the Oscar-winner's career.<span class="st"></span><br /><span class="st"><b>How She Can Save Movies: </b>By
 blazing an unexpected career trail that opens the door to different 
kinds of women performers and roles as she continues to play ugly (both 
inside and out) when the character is juicy and the story is good.<b><br /></b></span>&nbsp;<br /><b>Julianne Moore</b> <br />Moore
 is an example of a star who harnesses her power to act as a development
 catalyst, enabling a number of talented women to come together -- as in
 the Oscar-nominated dramedy <i>The Kids Are All Right</i>, with 
director/co-writer Lisa Cholodenko. Annette Bening got a best actress 
Oscar nom in the movie about the trials and tribulations of marriage and
 family in a household anchored by two Mommies, but it was Moore who 
committed to the part of a lesbian mother first. She exemplifies why intelligent actresses seeking broad spectrum roles that are complex and sexually active -- OMG! -- over the age of 40 have a personal motivation to see that projects like this get made. Otherwise, they can be relegated to a 
mother-and-wife character hell, where the talented actress never gets to 
carry the narrative "ball" and demonstrates little change from the movie's beginning to its
 end.<br /><span class="st"><b>How She Can Save Movies: </b>By using her appeal and star power to help bring non-mainstream movies the audiences -- and awards -- they deserve.</span><br /><br />For
 actresses, the biggest danger is that during their prime money-making 
years they are encouraged to repeat their successes -- Jennifer Anniston
 in romcoms, for example, or Angelina Jolie as an action femme fatale. 
That is the path to more money and status. The risk comes in harnessing 
the power of being an A-list brand and making the leap to create movies 
with lasting impact for women behind the scenes and in the theaters. <br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Avengers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/the-avengers-1/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115547</id>

    <published>2012-05-03T18:04:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-03T19:35:30Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s one thing to join a bunch of standalone superheroes in the comics and quite another in the movies. Superheroes are attention hogs, so commanding of the myopic spotlight that a single specimen can carry multiple films all on his/her...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason McKiernan</name>
        <uri>http://www.filmcritic.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Action" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Adventure" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's one thing to join a bunch of standalone superheroes in the comics and quite another in the movies. Superheroes are attention hogs, so commanding of the myopic spotlight that a single specimen can carry multiple films all on his/her own. In the comics, a writer has the freedom to develop origins and individual tangents, allowing each major character the time and space to chart their own stories while joining forces for the major set pieces. The serialization allows readers to settle into the superhero omnibus. On the big screen, however, time is swift and finite, even in an epic spectacle. A filmmaker has anywhere between 120 and 150 minutes to establish each character, bring them all together, develop a labyrinthine world domination plot, and save space for each character to make signature impressions amid a handful of massive action ballets. Somehow, against all odds, Joss Whedon does just that with <i>The Avengers</i>, a slam-bang comics-inspired blast where the superhero collective fuses seamlessly and works marvelously.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>It would seem nearly impossible to pull together several established superhero brands and tell the story of their rise as a team without frenetic pacing and incomprehensible leaps of logic. Whedon avoids such pitfalls by bringing the team together gradually, based on the story's need. There is no jazzy recruitment montage, though the film is as lively as any of the recent Marvel adaptations. Each character is introduced in their element, re-established as the iconic heroes we've come to know, and are drawn into the film's central conflict: reclaiming the Tesseract, a cube made of pure, boundless energy so powerful it could be harnessed for untold evil. Such evil is the design of Loki (Tom Hiddleston), Thor's fallen brother, who as the film begins steals the Tesseract from the S.H.I.E.L.D. compound and uses the power of his scepter to possess one of the organization's own, Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner).</p>In this hour of deepest need, S.H.I.E.L.D. director Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) revives the Avenger Initiative, a plan to assemble the world's greatest heroes and form a team of impenetrable power that would work together for the greater good. Working with S.H.I.E.L.D. master assassin Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), Fury aims to bring together Captain America (Chris Evans), preserved in ice for decades; Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), who has suppressed his Hulk tendencies by doing humanitarian work in impoverished areas; and Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), Iron Man himself. Sensing that his brother is stirring up trouble the world may not recover from, Thor (Chris Hemsworth) joins the fight as well, and thus The Avengers are assembled.<br /><br />It's remarkable how none of the characters get lost in the mix; each of their well-known personae is on full display. Downey's Stark is the dominant force, his brash sarcasm taking the lead among a group that meshes surprisingly well. As Captain America, Evans displays the same earnest likability that worked so well in <i>Captain America: The First Avenger</i>, with the added boost that in today's world, he is woefully out of touch. Hemsworth brings charm to the massive, growling Thor. And Johansson is far more than the presumed token female superhero. She often takes center stage, charts her own character arc, and -- minor spoiler alert -- never relies on the savior of a more powerful male. Ruffalo is the new guy on the block, taking on the Hulk, the most inwardly complex of the Marvel heroes -- made all the more complex by the fact that no one can seem to pull it off in a satisfying fashion. Ruffalo is the third actor in 11 years to tackle Bruce Banner, and he strikes a perfect balance of dry wit and inner torment. It seems as if he was born to play this role.<br /><br />The first act wrangles all of these disparate characters together. In the second act, we bear witness to growing pains, Avengers-style, with these super-alphas thrown together to bicker and quarrel over their assorted powers and ultimate shortcomings. As it turns out, such a power-struggle plays right into Loki's dastardly plot, a savvy move by Whedon, who also wrote the film's screenplay. It speaks to our inner fear as an audience -- how is it possible for these larger-than-life icons to not only co-exist, but share an entire film...and maybe a long-running franchise?<br /><br />The third act answers that question with 45 minutes of incessant, unbridled comic book action, complete with flying mythic creatures, city block destruction, and helping-hand heroics. Whedon spreads the wealth among the super friends with impressive evenness. Each character seizes multiple opportunities to save the day -- or at least, to sustain the day against the palooza of villainy while looking totally boss. It is in this final stretch that Whedon proves himself as possibly the best director for this particular material, as he deftly navigates the staggering spectacle with winking humor and a surprising visual acuity. By the end we feel a lot like our heroes -- battered, spent, and ready for some shawarma. But after we fill up, we're ready for another go.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/the-best-exotic-marigold-hotel/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115554</id>

    <published>2012-05-03T18:00:02Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-03T19:37:13Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s familiar fish-out-of-water meets nutty oldsters in the latest from Shakespeare in Love&apos;s John Madden. The premise finds British pensioners of all archetypical makes escaping to India because it&apos;s cheap and unusual. Hopefully, in the far off mystical East, they...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Gibron</name>
        <uri>http://www.billgibron.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's familiar fish-out-of-water meets nutty oldsters in the latest from <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1998/shakespeare-in-love/"><i>Shakespeare in Love</i>'</a>s John Madden. The premise finds British pensioners of all archetypical makes escaping to India because it's cheap and unusual. Hopefully, in the far off mystical East, they won't be treated like government/social/familial burdens. Our collective includes a man who was raised in "the Colony" (Tom Wilkinson), a widow trying to jump start a new life (Judi Dench), a couple (Bill Nighy and Penelope Wilton) whose marriage is crumbling, a pair of sexed-up singles (Celia Imrie and Ronald Pickup) and an elderly matron (Maggie Smith) in desperate need of some important medical care. They all end up in Dev Patel's rundown excuse for holiday lodging, a place where the phones don't work, there are no doors, and the dirty, grimy accommodations are less than inviting.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Everything's in place for a collection of cultural misunderstandings, laugh-along life lessons, and an eventual meeting of the ethnic minds. If you think it sounds familiar and you've seen something like it before, you'd be right. <i>The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel </i>comes from that recognizable school of eccentric English dramedies where expert actors and a simplistic premise lead to emotional epiphanies and showpiece performances. For Dench, it's dealing with the debt-ridden legacy left by her dead husband. For Wilkinson, it's leaving the High Court bench and facing a secret he's kept from everyone. Nighy and Wilton went broke supporting their daughter's entrepreneurial dreams, while Imrie and Pickup just wanna have some late in life fun. Only Smith seems under-served, her racist character and physical circumstance (a hip replacement) having none of the insight offered by the other relocated retirees. </p>
As for those in the sweltering land of spice and saris, Patel is in way over his cliche-created head. His mother wants him to give up this foolish dream of reestablishing his late father's inn. She's also pushing for an arranged marriage, frowning on his current, contemporary minded gal pal (Tena Desea).&nbsp; Since the entire subtext of the film is about taking risks and roaming outside your established comfort zone, everyone here is going to experiment and explore. Long established mindsets will shift and broken commitments will implode and then reluctantly reestablish. Some of the surprises are obvious. Others sneak up on you in ways that work beyond your cynicism and directly into your heart. There's no denying <i>The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel'</i>s effectiveness. It's reason for being, on the other hand...<br /><br />Unlike <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2008/slumdog-millionaire/"><i>Slumdog Millionaire</i></a>, which used a familiarized format (a game show) to clue us into the cultural intricacies of its unusual locale, this film has little to say about India itself. Sure, the cinematography and vistas look inviting, but we get none of the details. Instead, the broadest of brush strokes are used to paint everything, both comically and dramatically. Even the individual issues involved are easily worked out with a few words of wisdom or a sudden preplanned plot manipulation. But thanks to the uniform excellence of the cast, as well as the mountain of inferred meaning they bring to the proceedings, we buy what <i>The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel </i>is selling. It may be overly sentimental and pat, but it's still disarming and entertaining. <br /><br />As long as you can overcome the obvious familiarity within the film's foundation and if you can get lost in the excellent performances and individual moments, this movie will win you over. <i>The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel</i> may not be capable of living up to every word in the title, but it does make for one engaging escape, no matter your age. <br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>First Position</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/first-position/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115524</id>

    <published>2012-05-03T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-03T19:39:32Z</updated>

    <summary>When it comes to creative careers, choosing to become a ballet dancer is close to the most punishing one you could select. Starting from an age at which most children are still trying to master using a spoon while sitting...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Barsanti</name>
        <uri>http://www.chrisbarsanti.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Documentary" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>When it comes to creative careers, choosing to become a ballet dancer is close to the most punishing one you could select. Starting from an age at which most children are still trying to master using a spoon while sitting upright, would-be ballet dancers train for hours a day in the finer points of the craft. Bloody feet and broken bones are the least of it. As a record of this kind of endeavor, Bess Kargman's crowd-pleasing but ultimately dissatisfying documentary <i>First Position</i> doesn't come close to conveying the level of dedication required to become even moderately competent in ballet. However, if you want to see a clutch of thoroughly talented and frighteningly motivated young dancers get put through their paces in the pursuit of a scholarship to a top-line dance school, then Kargman's film is the ticket.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Like any good comeptition documentarian, Kargman first shows viewers her contestants and then gives them an idea of the stakes involved in the run-up to the prestigious Youth America Grand Prix; not surprisingly, they're high indeed. The half-dozen or so young dancers that Kargman follows here, aged from 10 to 17, are the tiniest fraction of the 5,000 or so children who will compete in the semi-finals taking place in 15 cities around the world. Just about every one of Kargman's stars seems to have the makings of a famous ballet dancer--the problem is that pretty much every other dancer captured by the camera seems as good or better. There's a cliff-like ratio here in that the surplus of young talent dwarfs the precious few jobs and scholarships out there.</p>
In another film or even TV show about young competiting artists (Kargman's relentlessly bright and peppy style mirrors more the latter than the former), the stakes involved of one of the protagonists not making it are frequently more of the heartbreak variety. One thing that First Position makes clear is just how much each of these children have sacrificed to get to where they are. The father of the oldest dancer, 17-year-old Rebecca (who seems at times like she should be tearing up the set of <i>My Sweet Sixteen</i>), points out with some frustration that with what they've paid for her dancing education so far could have paid for a four-year stint in college. A brother and sister duo, Jules (age 10) and Miko (age 12), have parents so dedicated to ballet that the father actually moved his company's office so that they could live and work closer to where the kids trained. Joan, a 16-year-old from Columbia, is as determined to make his way in the world of ballet as any immigrant laborer; there's no going back for him. Just as impressive are the 11-year-old Aran, a preternaturally calm and self-possessed 11-year-old prodigy, and Michaela, a 14-year-old war orphan from Sierra Leone who pushes through injuries with a stoic determiantion.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Kargman almost does herself a disservice by choosing the children that she did. Though there's no promise that these dancers are going to make it through to the finals in New York (at which point the 5,000 will have been whittled down to 300), there is little indication that the ones who don't make it won't have a career regardless. It's difficult to watch Aran, Miko, or 11-year-old Gaya (Aran's friend-maybe-girlfriend from Israel, one of the more entertaining subplots here) soaring with precision on the floor and not think that whatever happens, they'll be just fine. If <i>First Position</i> had gone deeper into its subject and presented a more layered film than a nicely-shot and moderately dramatic will-they-make-it story, then perhaps there would have been more at stake here.&nbsp;</div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Connection</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1962/the-connection/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115570</id>

    <published>2012-05-03T17:59:59Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-03T19:40:46Z</updated>

    <summary>Like many of the gritty old American experimental films that the intrepid resurrectionists over at Milestone have been unearthing, spit-shining, and gift-wrapping for eager cinemaphiles of late, Shirley Clarke&apos;s The Connection is a mixed bag. On the one hand, it&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Barsanti</name>
        <uri>http://www.chrisbarsanti.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Drama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Like many of the gritty old American experimental films that the intrepid resurrectionists over at Milestone have been unearthing, spit-shining, and gift-wrapping for eager cinemaphiles of late, Shirley Clarke's <i>The Connection</i> is a mixed bag. On the one hand, it's a riveting and adventurous spectacle of Lost Bohemia, riddled with junkie-artiste stream-of-consciousness and graced with a blow-the-roof-off jazz soundtrack. On the other, it's the worst kind of terribly determined mid-century American neo-realism, all mannered non-sequiturs and straining self-importance. (If nothing else, this is a film that tries <i>hard</i> at everything it does.) The sheer vivacity and discipline of vision that Clarke brings to this long-unseen and once controversial film wins out over its many negatives, but it's a close thing.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Clarke adapted the film from a 1959 play by Jack Gelber that was something of a love-it-or-hate-it downtown New York sensation at the time. Gelber's play was about a raggle-taggle apartment full of Greenwich Village junkies hanging out and waiting for their connection, a guy named Cowboy, to show up with their fix. While waiting, they haggle and maunder, talking the nonsense that junkies talk. (If the film had been shot a few years later, you could imagine the Velvet Underground's "I'm Waiting for the Man" playing in the background: "He's never early, he's always late / First thing you learn is that you always gotta wait.") Then, once Cowboy arrives, it's not at all what they expected.</p>
In her version, Clarke--one of the great American underground filmmakers who has been mostly lost to time--opened up the concept by adding a film-within-a-film. In the midst of the junkies' beatnik babble, a director puffed up on ideas of cinema verite realism tries to orchestrate them into his vision of documentary reality. He gripes at the cameraman, who answers back in kind from behind the screen, and then grabs his own handheld camera to get different angles. While the two of them alternate shots in a self-referential ruckus (the filmstrip itself occasionally breaks down), the less verbose junkies occasionally pick up their instruments and burst into brilliant song: <i>of course</i> there's a jazz band hanging out there.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>The structure is creaky and feels overly borrowed; a hipster soundtrack of beat lingo and cool jazz grafted on to a sub-Beckett conceit and spiced up with some Ionesco-style absurdity. It's easy to get lost in the whirling soliloquies here, particularly when it comes to the loudest addict of them all: Leach. Described by one of the others as being "a queer without being queer," Leach complains about all the "creeps" hanging around his pad, and seems more desperate for a fix than most. Then, when he finally gets his hands on some heroin, Clarke's camera zooms close in on the needle slipping in, the blood, the clenched-fist excitement. It's a raw treatment, the sort of thing that makes what Otto Preminger was doing with addict a few years earlier in <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1955/the-man-with-the-golden-arm/">The Man with the Golden Arm</a></i> seem almost laughably sanitized.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>The occasional curse word and (for the time) unfiltered look at the addicts' sweaty desperation caused problems for <i>The Connection</i> when it first opened. After a positive reception at Cannes in 1961, censorship problems in New York caused the film to be shut down after only two screenings (the projectionist was even arrested). Then, when the film finally received a true release, it sputtered and died--perhaps not surprisingly for such a spiky avant-garde work. This was never a film that was going to have any sizable kind of audience, and that's partially for good reasons. However, there's a lot of great worth to be seen here, whether it's Clarke's elegant handling of this tight space and choreographing around the wild, whooping jazz riffs or her sly satire on the filmmaker characters' pretensions of realism and the evocation of a long-passed subculture. Exhausting and occasionally juvenile, <i>The Connection</i> is, nevertheless, an experience.&nbsp;</div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>9 Scifi Films You Should See That You (Probably) Haven&apos;t</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/2012/05/9-scifi-films-you-should-see-that-you-probably-havent/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012:/features//270.6115531</id>

    <published>2012-05-02T05:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-02T03:18:35Z</updated>

    <summary>One of the interesting things about science fiction is that as genre, some of its most artistically and culturally significant films are also some of its most financially successful -- 2001: A Space Odyssey, Planet of the Apes, Star Wars,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Scalzi</name>
        <uri>http://scalzi.com/whatever</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="John Scalzi on Scifi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="2001aspaceodyssey" label="2001: a space odyssey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="akira" label="akira" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="alien" label="alien" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="alphaville" label="alphaville" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bradbird" label="brad bird" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="destinationmoon" label="destination moon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ettheextraterrestrial" label="e.t.: the extra-terrestrial" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fantasticplanet" label="fantastic planet" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="flashgordonspacesoldiers" label="flash gordon: space soldiers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fritzlang" label="fritz lang" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ghostintheshell" label="ghost in the shell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jeanlucgodard" label="jean-luc godard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="johnsayles" label="john sayles" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jurassicpark" label="jurassic park" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="metropolis" label="metropolis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="planetoftheapes" label="planet of the apes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="primer" label="primer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="shanecarruth" label="shane carruth" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="solyaris" label="solyaris" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starwars" label="star wars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="terminator2" label="terminator 2" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thebrotherfromanotherplanet" label="the brother from another planet" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theincredibles" label="the incredibles" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theirongiant" label="the iron giant" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thematrix" label="the matrix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="transformers" label="transformers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="walle" label="wall-e" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/">
        <![CDATA[One of the interesting things about science fiction is that as genre, some of its most artistically and culturally significant films are also some of its most financially successful -- <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1968/2001-a-space-odyssey/">2001: A Space Odyssey</a>, <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1968/planet-of-the-apes/">Planet of the Apes</a>, <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1977/star-wars-episode-iv---a-new-hope/">Star Wars</a>, <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1982/et-the-extra-terrestrial/">E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial</a>, <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1979/alien/">Alien</a></i>, and <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1991/terminator-2-judgment-day/">Terminator 2</a> </i>are just a few examples of this. <br /><br />Still, there are a number of truly interesting science fiction films that have slipped under the radar of the average science fiction filmgoer, often because they are old, or are foreign, or were film equivalents of the Velvet Underground, i.e., appreciated by few, but those few went off to become filmmakers of their own.<br /><br />With that in mind, here's a list of 9 science fiction films you should see that you (probably) haven't. Most of these are available through home video of some manner or another. In chronological order:<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[<i><b><br /><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1927/metropolis/">Metropolis</a><br />
  </b></i>The earliest acknowledged feature-length masterpiece of 
science fiction, you've probably seen snippets and images of it all your
 life. But Fritz Lang's magnificent work is hobbled by the fact that it's a 
silent film and that most previous releases have been truncated 
or edited. The most complete version of the film (which includes scenes 
lost for seven decades) is now available, and anyone who fancies 
themselves a science fiction film buff should see it immediately if not 
sooner.<br /><br /><i><b><a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/125572/Flash-Gordon-Space-Soldiers/details">Flash Gordon: Space Soldiers </a><br /></b></i>To be 
clear, this science fiction serial is goofy nonsense from start to 
finish, designed as filler on the undercard of Universal Pictures' other 
films, and shot using leftover sets from other productions. But there's a
 direct line between the serials of the '30s and <i>Star Wars</i> in the '70s and the brainless, slam-bang action of the <i>Transformers</i> films today. All that's changed are the budgets.<br /><br /><b><a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/13419/Destination-Moon/details"><i>Destination Moon</i></a><br /></b>The
 first film to make a halfway scientifically accurate attempt at space 
travel, and whose (now almost comically primitive) special effects were 
revolutionary enough to nab an Academy Award. Two special things of 
note: The film was written by science fiction legend Robert Heinlein, 
and it may be the first film where technical exposition is handled by a 
cartoon character (but not the last; see <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1993/jurassic-park/"><i>Jurassic Park</i></a>).<br /><br /><i><b><a href="www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1965/alphaville/">Alphaville</a><br /></b></i>Or, what happens when Jean-Luc Godard decides to send up two completely
 different genres at once: science fiction and film noir. Godard's idea 
of special effects is to suggest that a Ford Galaxie is a spaceship and that
 a light behind a fan is an intelligent computer, but that's part of the
 joke; this is the first film that goes meta on the genre.<br /><br /><i><b><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1972/solyaris/">Solyaris</a><br /></b></i>Is often described as the "Soviet <i>2001</i>,"
 which undersells both films. But what both films have in common is an 
unhurried, detached, and otherworldly approach to the human condition, 
mediated by an unknowable alien intelligence. Its very slow pace will 
test science fiction fans used to fast action and explosions. It's worth
 being tested. <br /><br /><a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/7250/Brother-from-Another-Planet/details"><i><b>The Brother from Another Planet</b></i></a><br />This
 highly acclaimed early film of director John Sayles is notable for 
being one of the first significant science fiction films with a black 
protagonist (and, as it takes place in Harlem, a largely minority cast).
 It's also significant in that it's essentially a personality piece, 
letting us see humanity through the silent observations of our hero. 
We're the aliens, in other words.<br /><br /><i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1995/ghost-in-the-shell/"><b>Ghost in the Shell</b></a><br />Akira</i>
 is the anime film that every science fiction film fan knows about, even
 if it's only because Hollywood keeps trying to make a live action 
version (usually by trying to make its cast Caucasian). <i>Ghost in the Shell,</i> however, is to my mind the rather more influential anime: If you can watch it and not see echos of every techno-dytopia from<i> The Matrix</i> forward in it, you're probably not trying hard enough. Look again.<br /><br /><i><b><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1999/the-iron-giant/">The Iron Giant</a><br /></b></i>Science fiction-themed animation existed before <i>The Iron Giant</i> (note in particular <i>Fantastic Planet</i>) and has been wildly successful since (see: <i>Wall-E</i>).
 But director Brad Bird's feature debut hits all the right notes and is 
both a love letter to the genre and proof that American animation could 
take science fiction seriously, a point Bird would later drive home with
 his Pixar film <i>The Incredibles</i>.<br /><br /><i><b><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2004/primer/">Primer</a><br /></b></i>Time
 travel flick notable for the fact that writer-director Shane 
Carruth doesn't dumb down the abstruse technical elements -- meaning it 
may be the most nerdishly pure film on this list -- and because it was 
put together for an absurdly low $7,000 investment. Science fiction 
doesn't always need $100 million to work. <br /><br />Why did I pick nine? 
Because I want you to pick the tenth. Put it in the comments. Make it 
one that you're pretty sure not everyone has seen, one that you think they 
should. If you pick a film that's made over $100 million domestically, 
try again. <br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>She&apos;s Hot, He&apos;s Not -- It Must Be Love</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/2012/04/she-is-hot-he-is-not-it-must-be-love/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012:/features//270.6115412</id>

    <published>2012-04-30T17:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-30T16:27:38Z</updated>

    <summary>We have gotten so used to the male-female beauty imbalance in life and movies that we hardly remark about it anymore. It&apos;s so Beauty and the Beast.The idea that a far-more-attractive woman is thrilled to be with a far-less-attractive man...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thelma Adams</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Thelma Adams on Reel Women" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="beautyandthebeast" label="beauty and the beast" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="chrishemsworth" label="chris hemsworth" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="emilyblunt" label="emily blunt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="forgettingsarahmarshall" label="forgetting sarah marshall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jackblack" label="jack black" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jasonsegel" label="jason segel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="juliedelpy" label="julie delpy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="katewinslet" label="kate winslet" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kristenwiig" label="kristen wiig" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rufussewell" label="rufus sewell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thefiveyearengagement" label="the five-year engagement" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/features/">
        <![CDATA[We have gotten so used to the male-female beauty imbalance in life and movies that we hardly remark about it anymore. It's so <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1991/beauty-and-the-beast/"><i>Beauty and the Beast</i></a>.<br /><br />The idea that a far-more-attractive woman is thrilled to be with a far-less-attractive man just seems intrinsically obvious to us. But why? Maybe it's one of women's superpowers: seeing the inner beauty in men, even when men don't have that same ability.<br /><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
  <o:AllowPNG/>
 </o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:TrackMoves/>
  <w:TrackFormatting/>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
  <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther>
  <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
  <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
   <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
   <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
   <w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
   <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <m:mathPr>
   <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
   <m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
   <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-"/>
   <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
   <m:dispDef/>
   <m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
   <m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
   <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
   <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
   <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
   <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
  </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
  DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
  LatentStyleCount="267">
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
   UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>
  <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin-top:0in;
	mso-para-margin-right:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	mso-para-margin-left:0in;
	line-height:115%;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
</style>
<![endif]-->]]>
        <![CDATA[<br />The latest case is <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/the-five-year-engagement/"><i>The Five-Year Engagement</i></a>,
 which hardly needs a plot summary -- duh, it's about a 
five-year-engagement between the characters played by Jason Segel and 
Emily Blunt, and whether they'll ever say, "I do." In the romcom, 
Segel's chef wears an apron with a really hot ripped body silkscreened 
on it. We see him often enough shirtless -- and pantless (why does Segel
 seem intent on taking off his pants? See <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2008/forgetting-sarah-marshall/"><i>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</i></a>)
 -- to know he's hardly Ryan Reynolds. Meanwhile, he's partnered with 
Blunt, who would be the prettiest in a room full of pretty women. <br /><br />Of
 course, Segel is not at all bad looking -- and he's tall. He's just not
 movie-star ripped. He's the kind of guy our moms would like us to bring
 home. And his character compensates for looks with charm bombs: He's 
cheeky, funny and sincere -- and he cooks.<br /><br />There are plenty of 
movies that rely on the "hot woman, not-so-hot man" trope -- even ones 
directed by women, like Nancy Meyers' romcom <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2006/the-holiday/"><i>The Holiday</i></a> with Kate Winslet, Rufus Sewell, and Jack Black.<a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2011/bridesmaids/"><i> Bridesmaids</i></a>
 plays with the beauty balance, too. It begins by making the groom so 
plain as to be a nonentity. (Think hard: What did he look like?) The 
love object for Kristen Wiig's Annie -- the patient, long-suffering cop 
played by Chris O'Dowd -- is cute enough (a seven?), certainly not cuter
 than Annie. He does have the benefit of having his feet more firmly 
planted on the asphalt. And then there's Jon Hamm's Ted, the male ten. 
Ted is so much more conventionally handsome than Wiig that he exploits 
his power position in the beauty imbalance. He behaves as if he's doing 
Annie a favor by giving her the benefit of his company.<br /><br />I 
confess, when I see Chris Hemsworth as Thor, he takes my breath away. 
(Cue audible sigh.) But if we were in the same bedroom, I think he would
 be too gorgeous for me. I'd be unpleasantly breathless and unable to 
communicate. For women, communication is every bit as hot as looks. <br /><br /><a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/the-reel-breakdown/julie-delpy-spends-2-days-york-declares-her-185721156.html">I was talking to the actress-director Julie Delpy</a> <i>(<a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1995/before-sunrise/">Before Sunrise</a></i>) last week about her latest movie, <a href="http://movies.amctv.com/movie/555025/2-Days-in-New-York/overview"><i>2 Days in New York</i></a>,
 and that stunning actress told me something that resonated: "I'm not 
attracted to beauty or cuteness in men. For me, beautiful men, it lasts 
two weeks. It actually becomes annoying after a while. If they're good 
people then you love them; if they're bad people, it doesn't matter if 
they're beautiful."<br /><br />Maybe the beauty imbalance -- she's hot, he's 
not so much -- works in part because women understand that surface beauty 
is a little like blue jeans: Throw them in the wash a few times and they start to shrink and fade. What really matters is the quality of the material. <br /><br />No amount of external beauty is going to make the 
days you spend together go any faster. When you're sitting in the dark at the movies, what matters is that the person beside you laughs
 at the same jokes and holds your hand in the scary parts.<br /><br />I'll go 
out on a limb here: Is it possible that the beauty imbalance is actually a 
pro-woman idea? Because it gives us the benefit of the doubt that even 
in a movie, a female character is driven by more profound desires than 
her male counterpart.<br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Safe (2012)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/safe-1/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115378</id>

    <published>2012-04-27T14:56:46Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-01T19:57:07Z</updated>

    <summary>Jason Statham is no longer an actor. He&apos;s a brand, a beefed up icon of steely action who tends to rise above the ridiculous scripts he agrees on to become a buff human adrenal gland. He&apos;s the Hulk minus the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Gibron</name>
        <uri>http://www.billgibron.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Action" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Jason Statham is no longer an actor. He's a brand, a beefed up icon of steely action who tends to rise above the ridiculous scripts he agrees on to become a buff human adrenal gland. He's the Hulk minus the massive roid rage outbursts, a model made out of sinew and sharp, angular cuts. Seeing his name on the marquee guarantees something -- a proficient amount of butt kicking, an abundance of bad-ass attitude, an occasional lapse into narrative illogic (or three). Luckily, <i>Safe</i> excels at all three, turning a could-have-been dud into a late Spring delight. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>You know this movie understands its star when it provides not one...not two...but three different villainous groups to muck up his otherwise melancholy day. Statham is Luke Wright, a former cop turned cage fighter who's still processing the loss of his family (his pregnant wife was killed by Russian mobsters). Into his down-on-its luck life runs little Mei (Catherine Chan), an Asian prodigy with a photographic memory. Forced by the Chinese mafia to use her skills to help hide their money, the information in her head could bring down not only Manhattan's main organized crime rings, but the NYC police -- led by corrupt Captain Wolf (Robert John Burke) -- and the Mayor (Chris Sarandon). Soon, Luke is battling all the city's baddies to keep Mei...well, you know the title. </p><i>Safe</i> is a like the hot fudge sundae you'd order off a typical diner menu. No sprinkles. No fancy whipped cream. No wet nuts. Just tons and tons of guilty pleasure vanilla ice cream violence and molten hot layers of luscious, intoxicating chocolate chutzpah. It's a bare bones B-movie pumped up with post modern techniques. It's immediate and brutal, bouncing off the screen as efficiently as its star's fists fly off faces. There is something soothing about seeing Statham in such familiar, flashpoint territory. He's not above shedding a tear, and gets nauseous after wiping out a few dozen hoodlums, but for the most part, he is an effective mayhem machine unleashed in a gritty noir NYC. None who oppose him stand a chance, and we wouldn't want it any other way. <br /><br />For writer/director Boaz Yakin, this is a creative upgrade. His previous films (<i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2000/remember-the-titans/">Remember the Titans</a>, <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2003/uptown-girls/">Uptown Girls</a></i>) didn't prepare us for such chaos. Sure, he stumbles a bit in bringing his chase scenes and choreographed fights to film, but there's an energy and electricity that's been lacking in many of his, and Statham's, recent turns. <i>Safe</i> is significantly more fun that <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2011/killer-elite/"><i>Killer Elite</i></a>, or that <i><a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2011/the-mechanic/">Mechanic</a> </i>remake. Granted, Yakin's script packs too much into too little time (this movie feels overstuffed at 90-plus minutes) and Miss Chan is not the most expressive actress in the child star biz, but for the most part, these are minor quibbles. <i>Safe</i> is the kind of exciting escapist fare that used to make the rounds at the nation's numerous drive-ins. It's like a refugee from the '70s time traveling to our new post-millennial medium -- and taking no prisoners. <br /><br />For his part, Statham stays secure in his place as the foremost British beat-down artist, his skill set and sandpaper stubble more than intact. If you're looking for something to satisfy your constant craving for pummelings and prolonged kung fu-inspired clashes, this is your cup of manic machismo. As a clever commercial ploy, as the byproduct of looks, build, and smart business management, this specific star has secured his place in the annals of action moviedom. <i>Safe</i> may not be as bugnuts insane as the <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2006/crank/"><i>Crank</i></a> films, but it does pack a similar wallop. While Yakin can claim some of the success, the true triumph is all Statham's. &nbsp;<br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Five-Year Engagement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/the-five-year-engagement/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115307</id>

    <published>2012-04-26T18:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-26T17:21:38Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s a shame, really. Jason Segel and co-star Emily Blunt have so much natural chemistry together that something like The Five Year Engagement should resonate with real emotion. As the onscreen couple attempting to mix career, relocation, and the realities...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Gibron</name>
        <uri>http://www.billgibron.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="comedy" label="comedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="romance" label="romance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a shame, really. Jason Segel and co-star Emily Blunt have so much natural chemistry together that something like <i>The Five Year Engagement</i> should resonate with real emotion. As the onscreen couple attempting to mix career, relocation, and the realities of modern romance, the two have a palpable connection. But that's only part of the genre mandates. Without a solid sampling of comedy, all we have&nbsp;is a couple of&nbsp;attractive actors in fake love. Unfortunately, the script by Mr. Segel and director Nicolas Stoller doesn't live up to their previous success - the hilarious <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2008/forgetting-sarah-marshall/"><i>Forgetting Sarah Marshall</i></a>. Instead, this feels like an incomplete draft, a version where initial punchlines weren't polished and where too much attention was paid to the onscreen relationship. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Up and coming chef Tom (Segel) meets future fiancé and psychology grad student Violet (Blunt) at a superhero themed New Year's Eve party. A year later, they are engaged. Initially, wedding plans proceed full steam ahead, but when Violet's sister (Alison Brie) gets pregnant by one of Tom's buddies (Chris Pratt) and the University of Michigan comes calling, the pair put off their nuptials and relocate to Ann Arbor. Naturally, this drives our heroine's domineering mother (Jacki Weaver) crazy. While in the Midwest, Violet falls under the tutelage of Department Head Winton Childs (Rhys Ifans) while Tom becomes depressed over his prospects. Eventually, five years pass and the couple are concerned about where their relationship is headed. </p>Had it tried not to be a member of the Friends of Apatow fraternity, had it simply allowed two special people to play out their complicated coupling with seriousness and some minor amusement, <i>The Five Year Relationship</i> would be a godsend. It would be that missing link between Woody Allen and the rest of the drivel that passes itself off as romantic comedy. Segel, for all his boisterous bromantics and clumsy charisma is a perfect match for Blunt, who uses her natural native accent to play both sweet and snarky. Together, they resonate as authentic, never once asking us to question the validity of their affections. Even during a last act onslaught of contrivances, what was obvious before is even more blatant - Tom and Violet belong together, and nothing that happens in the last 30 minutes can or so will mess that up. <br /><br />Too bad the movie doesn't fully grasp this fact. Instead, it meanders for several meaningless minutes (the film is over two hours long) looking to scrape up a few more laughs along the way. Even worse, it asks us to buy narrative stupidity that just doesn't make sense. Cellphones disappear when contact is no longer convenient. Discussions that should take days are wrapped up in a single scene. When we meet Winton, we know exactly where his character is coming from and where he is going. And then there is a moment when Tom does something so silly, so completely beyond who we believe he is, that it almost resets our respect for him. The eventual outcome isn't anticlimactic so much as mean. <br /><br />Sure, there are other misfires along the way (Tom turning into a hirsute hippy version of Ted Nugent, for one) and moments of betrothed bliss. But <em>The Five Year Engagement </em>can't decide what it wants to be -- authentic or anarchic. As a result, the electricity generated by Segel and Blunt goes for naught. There is nothing worse than a&nbsp;romantic comedy&nbsp;that's too dumb to realize it's lousy. <i>The Five Year Engagement</i> has the opposite problems. It thinks it's smart -- and suffers for it in the process. This should have been a lot better. <br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Raven</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2012/the-raven/" />
    <id>tag:www.filmcritic.com,2012://271.6115173</id>

    <published>2012-04-26T18:00:57Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-26T17:13:14Z</updated>

    <summary>Twisting the already warped tales of Edgar Allan Poe into a Se7en-like serial killer thriller, era appropriate and complete with the demented alcoholic author himself, must have seemed like a spiffy idea at the pitch meeting. After all, everyone from...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Gibron</name>
        <uri>http://www.billgibron.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="In Theaters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Thriller &amp; Suspense" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.filmcritic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Twisting the already warped tales of Edgar Allan Poe into a <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/1995/seven/"><i>Se7en</i></a>-like serial killer thriller, era appropriate and complete with the demented alcoholic author himself, must have seemed like a spiffy idea at the pitch meeting. After all, everyone from the late Michael Jackson to the pumped up Sylvester Stallone has been aiming to bring the American luminary, famous for such works as "The Tell Tale Heart" and "The Pit and the Pendulum", to the big screen. But where baffling biopics once ruled the reinvention, we now have <i>The Raven</i>, an askew mash-up of Poe references and typical genre tropes. While there is a great deal of potential in the premise, it is mostly lost in the routine direction of <a href="http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2006/v-for-vendetta/"><i>V for Vendetta</i> </a>helmer James McTeigue and the slight screenplay from Ben Livingston and Hannah Shakespeare.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>We catch up with the author (a decent John Cusack) upon returning to his hometown of Baltimore. He hopes that the publication of his latest review will reap the kind of financial reward that will keep his body in liquor and his love of local debutante Emily (Alice Eve) intact. Of course, her domineering dad, Colonel Hamilton (Brendan Gleeson) will have none of it. In the meantime, a mother and child are found murdered, and the crime seems to fit a scenario featured in one of Poe's works. Inspector Emmett Fields (Luke Evans) seeks out the famous writer for advice and soon, the duo are embroiled in a series of killings connected to such noted tales as "The Cask of Amontillado" and "The Masque of the Red Death." Eventually, Emily is kidnapped, the mysterious fiend wanting Poe himself to concoct one final flight of fancy detailing his deadly exploits. </p>In 1926, mystery author Agatha Christie disappeared for 12 days. To this day, what happened and her whereabouts remain unknown. Similarly, <i>The Raven</i> bookends its otherwise ordinary period piece Grand Guignol with an "explanation" as to Poe's final few hours and premature death at age 40. As with all "what ifs," the possibilities far outweigh the truth. Had this movie decided to take on the 'facts' of the troubled artist's passing, presuming his mental state and physical complaints from the vast knowledge we have of his addictions and demons, we might have something more than a standard slasher statement. Instead, the narrative tosses aside most of what we know about Poe to play detective. Add in a few blood-spattered set-pieces (including one involving a fount of CG gore) and some oddball casting and you've got a misfire masquerading as something meaningful. <br /><br />While Cusack acquits himself admirably, the rest of the actors appear uncomfortable. Poor Alice Eve is just too contemporary to be a 19th century ingénue and Evans broods like he's stumbled onto the most melancholy scenario in the history of law enforcement. While ancillary figures like Poe's publisher Reynolds (Kevin McNally) leave a lasting impression, the rest of the players are just pawns, protracted out across McTeigue's tired tableaux. Everything is dark and severely under lit, moments of substance slighted because we just can't tell what's going on. Similarly, Poe's character careens wildly between smart and insufferable. Cusack keeps him centered, but the movie constantly lets him down. <br /><br />Indeed, by constantly reminding us of better cinematic (and literary) ideals, <i>The Raven </i>can't help but suffer. The comparisons reveal the film's limited knowledge of both Poe's work and the mandates of the genre. Had they simply stuck with trying to explain this elusive, enigmatic author, we might have a powerful waking nightmare. Instead, we are stuck with a by-the-book spook show. Perhaps they should have used a different manuscript. <br /><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
